City of Columbia
Follow Us



Will Google Compare Be Viewed as a Successful Failure?

Robert Regis Hyle | February 24, 2016

Failure is not always a bad thing. There are many reasons why projects and initiatives don’t succeed and they can’t always be blamed on a lousy product. I have to believe Google’s decision to shut down Google Compare, its price comparison tool for personal auto insurance, falls under that category.

The big worry when Google made this initial foray into the insurance market was that one day the search-engine giant—or similar-sized technology companies—would use their technology skills and their capital to take over the most profitable lines of the insurance industry—personal auto and homeowners.

It could still happen, of course, but there will be plenty of dissection of the Google Compare carcass before another tech giant jumps into the fray.  

Matt Josefowicz, CEO of Novarica, urges insurers to refrain from reading too much into the Google decision.

“What Google seems to have proved is that the business InsWeb and others tried 15 years ago—converting comparison shoppers into immediate buyers directly through the comparison site—is still a lackluster business,” he says.

Deb Smallwood of Strategy Meets Action believes the industry should have mixed feelings about what happened to Google Compare.

“Should insurers be happy or sad?” she asks. “I say both. Sad to know that this attempt at innovation failed, but happy to know it is not the end, and the industry will learn from this.”  

Google Compare will barely mark its first anniversary by the time the site is shut down, but despite that relatively small period of time, Smallwood doesn’t believe Google acted rashly.

“The key to successful innovation is to know where to place your bets and know when to fold them,” she says. “Failure is part of the process. Google is one of the smartest and most innovative companies. It knows when to fold them, and knows when to reopen, too. I will not be surprised to see them reappear with the next-generation comparative tool, but rather than focus on insurers needs to quote, it will be focused on the consumer needs for insurance.”

Josefowicz agrees: “A bigger question is, what else did Google learn about insurance shoppers from this experiment, and how will they use that information to create new offerings that they can sell to the insurance industry?”

So insurers may not have seen the last of Google (or Amazon or a host of other tech companies) just yet. These companies didn’t get where they are by pouring billions into something only to expect millions in return.

Josefowicz points out Google already makes a ton of money off insurance through its AdWords.

“Google may have realized they can make more money with less investment selling advertising to insurers than selling insurance itself,” he said.

Featured articles

Hyland MR 9 7 2018

MT 4 10 2018 Large RHS


The Email Chat is a regular feature of the ITA Pro magazine and website. We send a series of questions to an insurance IT leader in search of thought-provoking responses on important issues facing the insurance industry.


ITA is pleased to present the 2014 Webinar Series. We have many topics for you to choose from and attendance is open to all ITA members. The webinar topics are current and exciting — ranging from predictive analytics to telematics and will focus on the direction insurance carriers need to follow for the future. All webinars are presented by insurance IT professionals along with some of the leading analysts and consultants in the field. There is no cost to attend an ITA webinar. For more information and to register for the webinar, click the “title” of the webinar below.


only online

Only Online Archive

ITA Pro Buyers' Guide

Vendor Views

Partner News